She Saw Torques On A Seesaw

Both conditions for equilibrium must be satisfied. In part (a), we are asked for a distance; thus, the second condition (regarding torques) must be used, since the first (regarding only forces) has no distances in it. To apply the second condition for equilibrium, we first identify the system of interest to be the seesaw plus the two children. We take the supporting pivot to be the point about which the torques are calculated. We then identify all external forces acting on the system.

The three external forces acting on the system are the weights of the two children and the supporting force of the pivot. Let us examine the torque produced by each. Torque is defined to be

Here $\theta =\mathrm{90º}$, so that $\text{sin}\theta =1$ for all three forces. That means $r_{\perp }=r$ for all three. The torques exerted by the three forces are first,

second,

and third,

Note that a minus sign has been inserted into the second equation because this torque is clockwise and is therefore negative by convention. Since $F_{\text{p}}$ acts directly on the pivot point, the distance $r_{\text{p}}$ is zero. A force acting on the pivot cannot cause a rotation, just as pushing directly on the hinges of a door will not cause it to rotate. Now, the second condition for equilibrium is that the sum of the torques on both children is zero. Therefore

or

Weight is mass times the acceleration due to gravity. Entering ${\mathit{mg}}_{}$ for $w$, we get

Solve this for the unknown $r_2$:

The quantities on the right side of the equation are known; thus, $r_2$ is

As expected, the heavier child must sit closer to the pivot (1.30 m versus 1.60 m) to balance the seesaw.

This part asks for a force $F_{\text{p}}$. The easiest way to find it is to use the first condition for equilibrium, which is

The forces are all vertical, so that we are dealing with a one-dimensional problem along the vertical axis; hence, the condition can be written as

where we again call the vertical axis the y-axis. Choosing upward to be the positive direction, and using plus and minus signs to indicate the directions of the forces, we see that

This equation yields what might have been guessed at the beginning:

So, the pivot supplies a supporting force equal to the total weight of the system:

Entering known values gives

The two results make intuitive sense. The heavier child sits closer to the pivot. The pivot supports the weight of the two children. Part (b) can also be solved using the second condition for equilibrium, since both distances are known, but only if the pivot point is chosen to be somewhere other than the location of the seesaw’s actual pivot!